Should continuous dopaminergic stimulation be a standard of care in advanced Parkinson's disease?

The standard of care is a term that refers to the level of care, skill, and treatment that a healthcare provider should offer to a patient based on the current scientific evidence and the level of medical knowledge available in the field. For Parkinson's disease (PD), the standard care is mostly considered to be oral treatment with dopaminergic drugs, particularly levodopa which remains the 'gold standard'. However, effective management with levodopa during the later stages of the disease becomes increasingly challenging due to the ongoing neurodegenerative process, the consequences of its pulsatile dopaminergic stimulation, and the gastrointestinal barriers to effective drug absorption. As a result, the concept of applying continuous dopaminergic stimulation has emerged with infusion therapies (continuous subcutaneous apomorphine, levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel, and levodopa-entacapone-carbidopa intestinal gel infusion). These therapies seek to provide continuous stimulation of striatal dopamine receptors that is efficient not only in alleviating clinical symptoms, but also in delaying, reducing, and possibly preventing the onset of levodopa-related motor (fluctuations, dyskinesia) and non-motor complications; and they are also associated with clinically relevant side effects. Clinical studies and real-life experience support the notion that infusion therapies should be accepted as part of the standard of care for patients with advanced PD who have refractory, severe, and disabling motor complications that affect their quality of life. However, they should be considered based on the needs of individualized patients and the access to these advanced therapies needs to be made more accessible to the general PD population.

Adopting the Rumsfeld approach to understanding the action of levodopa and apomorphine in Parkinson's disease.

Dopaminergic therapies dominate the treatment of the motor and non-motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD) but there have been no major advances in therapy in many decades. Two of the oldest drugs used appear more effective than others-levodopa and apomorphine-but the reasons for this are seldom discussed and this may be one cause for a lack of progress. This short review questions current thinking on drug action and looks at whether adopting the philosophy of ex-US Secretary of State Donald Rumsfeld reveals 'unknown' aspects of the actions of levodopa and apomorphine that provide clues for a way forward. It appears that both levodopa and apomorphine have a more complex pharmacology than classical views would suggest. In addition, there are unexpected facets to the mechanisms through which levodopa acts that are either forgotten as 'known unknowns' or ignored as 'unknown unknowns'. The conclusion reached is that we may not know as much as we think about drug action in PD and there is a case for looking beyond the obvious.

The effect of saline versus air for cuff inflation on the incidence of high intra-cuff pressure in paediatric MicroCuff® tracheal tubes: a randomised controlled trial.

The use of cuffed tracheal tubes in paediatric anaesthesia is now common. The use of nitrous oxide in anaesthesia risks excessive tracheal tube cuff pressures, as nitrous oxide can diffuse into the cuff during the course of surgery. The aim of this single-centre, prospective, randomised controlled trial was to compare the effect of saline versus air for the inflation of tracheal tube cuffs on the incidence of excessive intra-operative cuff pressure in children undergoing balanced anaesthesia with nitrous oxide. Children (age ≤ 16 y) were randomly allocated to receive either saline (saline group) or air (air group) to inflate the cuff of their tracheal tube. The pressure in the tracheal tube cuff was measured during surgery and brought down to the initial inflation level if it breached a safe limit (25 cmH2 O). Post-extubation adverse respiratory events were noted. Data from 48 patients (24 in each group), aged 4 months to 16 y, were analysed. The requirement for reduction in intra-cuff pressure occurred in 1/24 patients in the saline group, compared with 16/24 patients in the air group (p < 0.001). The incidence of extubation-related adverse events was similar in the saline and air groups (15/24 vs. 13/24, respectively; p = 0.770). The use of saline to inflate the cuff of paediatric cuffed tubes reduces the incidence of high intra-cuff pressures during anaesthesia. This may provide a pragmatic extra safety barrier to help reduce the incidence of excessive tracheal cuff pressure when nitrous oxide is used during paediatric anaesthesia.

Cholinergic manipulation of motor disability and L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia in 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)-treated common marmosets.

Anti-cholinergic drugs are used in the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) and they can improve motor disability in some patients and may alter the expression of dyskinesia. We report the effects of anticholinergic and pro-cholinergic agents administered alone and combined with L-DOPA, on motor function in 1-methyl-4-phenyl-l,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)-treated common marmosets. Administration of atropine to MPTP-treated marmosets, not previously exposed to L-DOPA, improved motor disability but this did not occur with other centrally acting anti-cholinergics. Motor disability was worsened by centrally acting pro-cholinergics. However, neither peripherally acting anti- nor pro-cholinergics produced any effect on motor disability or dyskinesia. In MPTP-treated marmosets previously primed with L-DOPA to exhibit dyskinesia, acute L-DOPA challenge induced both chorea and dystonia. In these animals, centrally acting anti-cholinergics including atropine and trihexyphenidyl reversed motor deficits, but induced chorea. Combined with L-DOPA, both centrally and peripherally acting anti-cholinergics reduced peak locomotor activity and produced more chorea than dystonia compared to L-DOPA alone. Centrally acting pro-cholinergics decreased locomotor activity, worsened motor disability and induced dystonia. Co-administered with L-DOPA, pro-cholinergics reduced locomotor activity and decreased chorea while increasing dystonia compared with L-DOPA alone. In conclusion, anti-cholinergics can increase chorea with and without L-DOPA but improve motor disability. Pro-cholinergics decrease the proportion of chorea when combined with L-DOPA, increase motor disability and antagonise L-DOPA's effectiveness. These data suggest that there may be a case for revisiting the use of anti-cholinergic drugs in the treatment of PD.

Tratamento da apneia obstrutiva do sono / Obstructive Sleep Apnea Treatment

A Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono é uma morbidade de alta prevalência e com diversas consequências cardiovasculares. Atualmente, existem várias formas de tratamento, sendo a pressão positiva contínua de vias aéreas superiores (CPAP) a principal delas, especialmente para casos sintomáticos e as formas mais graves. No entanto, outras formas de tratamento estão disponíveis para formas mais leves deste distúrbio do sono, tais como: perda de peso, dispositivos de avanço mandibular, exercícios orofaríngeos e procedimentos cirúrgicos. Cada uma dessas modalidades tem encontrado seu espaço no tratamento da Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono, sendo fundamental a participação de uma equipe multidisciplinar para a escolha do melhor tratamento. Esse artigo de revisão do tratamento da Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono tem como foco o benefício cardiovascular associado ao tratamento deste importante e prevalente distúrbio respiratório do sono.

The Obstructive Sleep Apnea is a highly prevalent condition with several cardiovascular consequences. Currently, there are several forms of treatment. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the main one, especially for symptomatic cases and more severe forms of Obstructive Sleep Apnea. However, other forms of treatment for Obstructive Sleep Apnea are available for milder forms of this sleep-disordered breathing such as weight loss, mandibular advancement devices, oropharyngeal exercises and surgical procedures. Each of these modalities has found indications in the treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea. In this scenario, it is fundamental toa multidisciplinary team to choose the best treatment. This review article addresses the treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea focusing on the cardiovascular benefit associated with treatment of this important and prevalent sleep-disordered breathing.

Moving from continuous dopaminergic stimulation to continuous drug delivery in the treatment of Parkinson's disease.

Motor fluctuations and motor complications are a major consequence of the treatment and progression of Parkinson's disease (PD) and they have, in particular, been linked to L-dopa therapy. Using continuous dopaminergic stimulation (CDS) by employing longer acting dopaminergic drugs has been proposed as a means of avoiding or lowering their occurrence. However, both the preclinical and clinical evidence base suggest that this concept does not fully explain the differences between L-dopa and dopamine (DA) agonist drugs and that their pharmacological profiles may also be important. In addition, the way in which drugs are delivered in PD appears to have a marked influence on both efficacy and side-effect profile. As a consequence, the concept of continuous drug delivery (CDD) has arisen to explain the differences between the intermittent and continuous delivery of both L-dopa and DA agonists. This review presents the evidence for using CDD as a working concept for the early and later stages of PD and in the treatment of motor complications and motor fluctuations. CDD as an approach to the treatment of PD may improve the outcome of therapy and explain the differences between drug classes and the delivery systems employed.

Striatal plasticity in Parkinson's disease and L-dopa induced dyskinesia.

Striatal function adapts to the loss of nigrostriatal dopaminergic input in Parkinson's disease (PD) to initially maintain voluntary movement, but subsequently changes in response to drug treatment leading to the onset of motor complications, notably dyskinesia. Alterations in presynaptic dopaminergic function coupled to changes in the response of post-synaptic dopaminergic receptors causing alterations in striatal output underlie attempts at compensation and the control of movement in early PD. However, eventually compensation fails and persistent changes in striatal function ensue that involve morphological, biochemical and electrophysiological change. Key alterations occur in cholinergic and glutamatergic transmission in the striatum and there are changes in motor programming controlled by events involving LTP/LTD. Dopamine replacement therapy with L-dopa modifies altered striatal function and restores motor function but non-physiological dopamine receptor stimulation leads to altered signalling through D1 and D2 receptor systems and changes in striatal function causing abnormalities of LTP/LTD mediated through glutamatergic/nitric oxide (NO) mechanisms. These lead to the onset of dyskinesia and underlie the priming process that characterise dyskinesia and its persistence.

Continuous drug delivery in early- and late-stage Parkinson's disease as a strategy for avoiding dyskinesia induction and expression.

The treatment of the motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD) is dependent on the use of dopamine replacement therapy in the form of L: -dopa and dopamine agonist drugs. However, the development of dyskinesia (chorea, dystonia, athetosis) can become treatment limiting. The initiation of dyskinesia involves a priming process dependent on the presence of nigral dopaminergic cell loss leading to alterations in basal ganglia function that underlie the expression of involuntary movements following the administration of each drug dose. Once established, dyskinesia is difficult to control and it is even more difficult to reverse the priming process. Dyskinesia is more commonly induced by L: -dopa than by dopamine agonist drugs. This has been associated with the short duration of L: -dopa causing pulsatile stimulation of postsynaptic dopamine receptors compared to the longer acting dopamine agonists that cause more continuous stimulation. As a result, the concept of continuous dopaminergic stimulation (CDS) has arisen and has come to dominate the strategy for treatment of early PD. However, CDS has flaws that have led to the general acceptance that continuous drug delivery (CDD) is key to the successful treatment of PD. Studies in both experimental models of PD and in clinical trials have shown CDD to improve efficacy, but reduce dyskinesia induction, and to reverse established involuntary movements. Two key clinical strategies currently address the concept of CDD: (1) in early-, mid- and late-stage PD, transdermal administration of rotigotine provides 24 h of drug delivery; (2) in late-stage PD, the constant intraduodenal administration of L: -dopa is utilized to improve control of motor symptoms and to diminish established dyskinesia. This review examines the rationale for CDD and explores the clinical benefit of using such a strategy for the treatment of patients with PD.

The partial dopamine agonist pardoprunox (SLV308) administered in combination with l-dopa improves efficacy and decreases dyskinesia in MPTP treated common marmosets.

Dopamine agonist treatment in early Parkinson's disease (PD) induces less dyskinesia than l-dopa. However, once dyskinesia has developed, dopamine agonists administered with l-dopa exacerbate involuntary movements. The dopamine partial D2/D3 agonist pardoprunox reverses motor deficits in 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine hydrochloride (MPTP)-treated primates without hyperactivity, indicating that pardoprunox may alleviate dyskinesia without compromising l-dopa's beneficial actions. This study examines a clinical scenario in which pardoprunox was introduced, in an l-dopa sparing strategy, to existing l-dopa treatment in MPTP-treated marmosets previously primed to express dyskinesia. l-Dopa (5-10 mg/kg) produced effects, which were stable over the 13 treatment days, of increased locomotor activity, reversed motor disability and marked dyskinesia. Pardoprunox (SLV308; 0.0125-0.025 mg/kg) plus l-dopa (3-10 mg/kg) administration increased locomotor activity over the same treatment period and initially produced an equivalent reversal of motor disability compared to l-dopa, however this effect was enhanced as treatment progressed. This reflected the prolonged duration of effect of pardoprunox compared to that of l-dopa. While pardoprunox plus l-dopa treatment initially produced dyskinesia to the same extent as l-dopa alone, the intensity diminished as treatment progressed and it was significantly different at the end of the study. On subsequent l-dopa challenge there was no difference in motor disability reversal between those animals previously treated with pardoprunox plus l-dopa compared to l-dopa alone but the combination treatment produced significantly less dyskinesia. These data suggest that pardoprunox may provide therapeutic benefit in mid to late stage PD by reducing dyskinesia while maintaining efficacy when used with concomitant l-dopa treatment.

An in vivo pharmacological evaluation of pardoprunox (SLV308)--a novel combined dopamine D(2)/D(3) receptor partial agonist and 5-HT(1A) receptor agonist with efficacy in experimental models of Parkinson's disease.

Partial D(2/3) dopamine (DA) receptor agonists provide a novel approach to the treatment of the motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD) that may avoid common dopaminergic side-effects, including dyskinesia and psychosis. The present study focussed on the in vivo pharmacological and therapeutic characterisation of the novel D(2/3) receptor partial agonist and full 5-HT(1A) receptor agonist pardoprunox (SLV308; 7-[4-methyl-1-piperazinyl]-2(3H)-benzoxazolone monochloride). Pardoprunox induced contralateral turning behaviour in rats with unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine-induced lesions of the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc) (MED=0.03mg/kg; po). In 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)-treated common marmosets, pardoprunox dose-dependently increased locomotor activity (MED=0.03mg/kg; po) and decreased motor disability (MED=0.03mg/kg; po). The effects of pardoprunox were reversed by the D(2) antagonist sulpiride. In contrast pardoprunox attenuated novelty-induced locomotor activity (MED=0.01mg/kg; po), (+)-amphetamine-induced hyperlocomotion (MED=0.3mg/kg; po) and apomorphine-induced climbing (MED=0.6mg/kg; po) in rodents. Pardoprunox also induced 5-HT(1A) receptor-mediated behaviours, including flat body posture and lower lip retraction (MED=0.3mg/kg; po) and these were reversed by the 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist WAY100635. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that pardoprunox possesses dopamine D2/3 partial agonist effects, 5-HT1A agonist effects and reduces parkinsonism in animal models. functional DA D(2) receptor partial agonist activity and is effective in experimental models predictive of efficacy in PD. The presence of functional 5-HT(1A) agonist activity might confer anti-dyskinetic activity and have effects that control neuropsychiatric components of PD.

Continuous rotigotine administration reduces dyskinesia resulting from pulsatile treatment with rotigotine or L-DOPA in MPTP-treated common marmosets.

We previously showed that continuous infusion of rotigotine resulted in less dyskinesia than repeated pulsatile rotigotine administration or repeated oral administration of L-DOPA in MPTP-treated marmosets. Now we investigate whether continuous rotigotine delivery modifies established dyskinesia induced by prior exposure to repeated pulsatile administration of L-DOPA or rotigotine in MPTP-treated common marmosets. Repeated oral administration of L-DOPA or subcutaneous bolus administration of rotigotine over 28 days improved motor deficits but resulted in the onset of dyskinesia of moderate intensity. When these animals were switched to a 28-day continuous infusion of rotigotine, the reversal of motor disability was maintained. In those animals initially treated with L-DOPA, there was a small reduction in dyskinesia intensity but a significant reduction in the duration of dyskinesia. However, in animals initially treated with repeated bolus administration of rotigotine, dyskinesia intensity was significantly reduced. Initial treatment with a continuous infusion of rotigotine for 28 days reversed motor disability and resulted in a low incidence of dyskinesia. On switching to repeated oral administration of L-DOPA, the improvement in motor disability was maintained but the propensity of L-DOPA to provoke dyskinesia was not affected. In addition, while the continuous delivery of rotigotine prevented the expression of dyskinesia, the previously demonstrated ability of dopamine agonists to prime for dyskinesia could not be avoided. These data suggest that dyskinesia induced by pulsatile drug treatment may be improved by switching to continuous rotigotine delivery. In addition, while continuous delivery of rotigotine may prime for dyskinesia, it does not lead to its expression.

Perspectives on recent advances in the understanding and treatment of Parkinson's disease.

There have been numerous important recent advances in our understanding of the causes of Parkinson's disease (PD), the treatments available and how these are best applied for the long-term management of patients. Novel genes causing familial PD have been discovered and mechanisms leading to cell dysfunction and death identified. The PD prodrome is now a subject of great interest and clinical markers are being defined that may in future, together with biochemical markers, support an early, pre-motor diagnosis of PD. This will become important as new therapies are developed to modify disease progression. In the interim, the optimization of existing therapies remains an important priority. The value of existing and novel continuous drug delivery systems in PD is seen as providing simplified regimens, maintenance of motor control, reduction in motor complications and improved patient adherence to drug use.

Continuous administration of rotigotine to MPTP-treated common marmosets enhances anti-parkinsonian activity and reduces dyskinesia induction.

Rotigotine is a novel, non-ergoline dopamine D(3)/D(2)/D(1)-receptor agonist for the treatment of Parkinson's disease that can be continuously delivered by the transdermal route to provide stable plasma levels. Continuous drug delivery should reduce the risk of dyskinesia induction in comparison to pulsatile dopaminergic treatment. Thus the aim of the study was to compare the reversal of motor disability and induction of dyskinesia produced by continuous compared to pulsatile rotigotine administration in MPTP-treated common marmosets. The study also investigated whether pulsatile or continuous rotigotine administration in combination with l-DOPA prevented l-DOPA-induced dyskinesia. Animals were treated for 28 days with vehicle or pulsatile (twice daily) or continuous delivery of rotigotine (via an osmotic minipump). Subsequently, l-DOPA was then co-administered for a further 28 days. Animals were assessed for locomotor activity, motor disability and dyskinesia induction. The study showed that both continuous and pulsatile administration of rotigotine improved motor deficits and normalized motor function in MPTP-treated monkeys. However, continuous rotigotine delivery reduced dyskinesia expression compared to pulsatile treatment. Both pulsatile and continuous rotigotine administration produced less dyskinesia than administration of l-DOPA alone. The addition of l-DOPA to either pulsatile or continuous rotigotine treatment resulted in the induction of marked dyskinesia similar to that produced by treatment with l-DOPA alone. These data further support the hypothesis that continuous delivery of a dopaminergic agent reduces the risk of dyskinesia induction. However, continuous rotigotine administration did not prevent l-DOPA from inducing dyskinesia suggesting that l-DOPA may induce dyskinesia by mechanisms different from dopamine agonist drugs.

Levodopa in the treatment of Parkinson's disease.

The predominant motor features of Parkinson's disease (PD) are caused by degeneration of dopaminergic neurones and can be reversed in part or whole by dopamine replacement or augmentation strategies. Physicians have most experience with the use of levodopa, which remains the most potent oral dopaminergic treatment for PD. There are reservations about the long-term use of levodopa, most particularly in the context of its propensity to induce motor fluctuations and dyskinesias. Strategies exist to delay or diminish these complications, but the physician must lay the basis for these in the selection of drugs for early treatment and the sequence of drugs introduced subsequently. Levodopa efficacy and duration of effect may be enhanced by combination with a catechol-O-methyl transferase inhibitor. Maintaining good motor function and quality of life remain the primary goals of therapy and the principle that treatment must be tailored to the individual patient's needs is paramount.

Adenosine, adenosine A 2A antagonists, and Parkinson's disease.

Adenosine derived from the degradation of ATP/AMP functions as a signalling molecule in the nervous system through the occupation of A1, A2, and A3 adenosine receptors. Adenosine A(2A) receptors have a selective localization to the basal ganglia and specifically to the indirect output pathway, and as a consequence offer a unique opportunity to modulate the output from the striatum that is believed critical to the occurrence of motor components of PD. Indeed, the ability of A(2A) antagonists to modulate basal ganglia neurotransmission has been shown to be associated with improved motor function in experimental models of PD. This suggests that A(2A) antagonists would be effective as a symptomatic treatment in humans without provoking marked dyskinesia. Indeed, the A(2A) antagonist istradefylline reduces OFF time in moderate- to late-stage patients with PD already receiving dopaminergic therapy, with an increase in non-troublesome dyskinesia. Adenosine and adenosine receptors also exert actions relevant to pathogenesis in PD, raising the possibility of their use as neuroprotective agents. Both epidemiologic evidence and the current preclinical data strongly support a role for A(2A) antagonists in protecting dopaminergic neurons and influencing the onset and progression of PD.

Continuous delivery of ropinirole reverses motor deficits without dyskinesia induction in MPTP-treated common marmosets.

L-DOPA treatment of Parkinson's disease induces a high incidence of motor complications, notably dyskinesia. Longer acting dopamine agonists, e.g. ropinirole, are thought to produce more continuous dopaminergic stimulation and less severe dyskinesia. However, standard oral administration of dopamine agonists does not result in constant plasma drug levels, therefore, more continuous drug delivery may result in both prolonged reversal of motor deficits and reduced levels of dyskinesia. Therefore, we compared the effects of repeated oral administration of ropinirole to constant subcutaneous infusion in MPTP-treated common marmosets. Animals received oral administration (0.4 mg/kg, BID) or continuous infusion of ropinirole (0.8 mg/kg/day) via osmotic minipumps for 14 days (Phase I). The treatments were then switched and continued for a further 14 days (Phase II). In Phase I, locomotor activity was similar between treatment groups but reversal of motor disability was more pronounced in animals receiving continuous infusion. Dyskinesia intensity was low in both groups however there was a trend suggestive of less marked dyskinesia in those animals receiving continuous infusion. In Phase II, increased locomotor activity was maintained but animals switched from oral to continuous treatment showing an initial period of enhanced locomotor activity. The reversal of motor disability was maintained in both groups, however, motor disability tended towards greater improvement following continuous infusion. Importantly, dyskinesia remained low in both groups suggesting that constant delivery of ropinirole neither leads to priming nor expression of dyskinesia. These results suggest that a once-daily controlled-release formulation may provide improvements over existing benefits with standard oral ropinirole in Parkinson's disease patients.

Striatal output markers do not alter in response to circling behaviour in 6-OHDA lesioned rats produced by acute or chronic administration of the monoamine uptake inhibitor BTS 74 398.

The monoamine uptake inhibitor BTS 74 398 induces ipsilateral circling in 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) lesioned rats without induction of abnormal motor behaviours associated with L-dopa administration. We examined whether this was reflected in the expression of peptide mRNA in the direct and indirect striatal output pathways.6-OHDA lesioning of the nigrostriatal pathway increased striatal expression of PPE-A mRNA and decreased levels of PPT mRNA with PPE-B mRNA expression remaining unchanged. Acute L-dopa administration normalised PPE-A mRNA and elevated PPT mRNA while PPE-B mRNA expression remained unchanged. Acute administration of BTS 74 398 did not alter striatal peptide mRNA levels. Following chronic treatment with L-dopa, PPE-A mRNA expression in the lesioned striatum continued to be normalised and PPT mRNA was increased compared to the intact side. PPE-B mRNA expression was also markedly increased relative to the non-lesioned striatum. Chronic BTS 74 398 administration did not alter mRNA expression in the 6-OHDA lesioned striatum although small increases in PPT mRNA expression in the intact and sham lesioned striatum were observed. The failure of BTS 74 398 to induce changes in striatal neuropeptide mRNA correlated with its failure to induce abnormal motor behaviours or behavioural sensitisation but does not explain how it produces a reversal of motor deficits. An action in another area of the brain appears likely and may explain the subsequent failure of BTS 74 398 and related compounds to exert anti-parkinsonian actions in man.

Striatal leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 mRNA is increased in 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine-lesioned common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) with L-3, 4-dihydroxyphenylalanine methyl ester-induced dyskinesia.

The level of leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (Lrrk2) mRNA expression was measured by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction in anterior striatum from normal and 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)-treated common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) that had L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine methyl ester (L-DOPA)-induced dyskinesia. The level of striatal Lrrk2 mRNA was increased in MPTP-treated common marmosets that had L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia compared with normal animals that did not receive l-DOPA. Marmosets that exhibited higher levels of dyskinesia had the greatest increase in striatal Lrrk2 mRNA. Lrrk2 mRNA expression was also measured in human striatum and substantia nigra from control subjects and patients dying with Parkinson's disease. In contrast to marmoset tissue, no alteration in Lrrk2 mRNA expression was found in parkinsonian human brain. However, the brain was from patients who had an overall low level of dyskinesia. The correlation between striatal Lrrk2 mRNA levels in MPTP-treated common marmoset striatum and L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia indicates that LRRK2 may have a role in the molecular alterations that cause L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia.